This post provides steps on how to write a good critique, what makes up a compelling critique, and tips for writing successful critiques. Critiquing is not about you—it’s about the audience.
A critique paper is a written evaluation of an academic work that provides positive and negative feedback on its strengths and weaknesses.
Critique papers are often used in English classes in university or college where students analyze literature pieces. They also pop up in other subjects like science class, where students might review scientific experiments for accuracy and clarity.
The goal is to provide constructive criticism to the author for them to improve their work. Critique papers are typically assigned by professors either after reading the student’s own writing or after they’ve submitted someone else’s essay, presentation, or other assignments.
When writing your critique paper, it is essential to offer advice and cite examples so the writer can see what you’re talking about.
- Establish credibility with the reader
This can be done by opening with a hook and providing background information on why you should be qualified to write this critique.
- Explain your qualifications and how they make you uniquely qualified to provide criticism on the work in question.
- Provide your reader with a brief assessment of the work. You should critique its strengths and weaknesses as you see them. This should be followed by a more specific analysis of what works and doesn’t work about the essay, presentation, or other assignments.
- Do thorough research on the topic.
- When critiquing, provide the evidence the author used to make their argument. This will be important in your analysis. It also helps back up your claims and gives them credibility.
Additionally, you should provide evidence of how the topic relates to what has already been researched about this topic.
- Be clear and concise with your language. Your points should be direct and not convoluted or confusing to your reader. Also, make sure you explain any terms that may be unfamiliar to
This critique section provides basic information about the publication you evaluate, including its title, author(s), date published, and central argument(s). You will also need to briefly describe your own academic background and area of specialization to establish how qualified you are to write this type of assignment.
Your thesis statement is an argumentation structure where you make your perspective clear on the significance of the text to other scholars.
A good critique paper should be over three body paragraphs:
This is dedicated to providing background information about yourself and the general assessment of the work. It is essential to provide your reader with a background on why you are qualified to write this critique. Your reader should also know the strengths and weaknesses of the work and how they can be improved upon.
Make your argument and discuss your evaluations against the original work. Present your evidence. Remember to give facts, not opinions.
Conclusions are used to summarize the author’s main points noted in the article. It also includes a summary of the main points from your own (personal) analysis-noted during critical evaluation. When writing the conclusion, discuss the significance of the research and give appropriate recommendations for future research.
Place the works cited section at the end of your article with all cited information in proper MLA format. Make sure you have a minimum of 3 sources.
Remember, a critique paper is not about you. It is about improving the work in question. Make sure to focus your critique on the work itself and not criticize the writer’s character or intentions.
Once you have finished writing your critique, the final step is to go back and revise it. Check for any spelling or grammatical errors, fix any awkward phrasing or sentences that do not flow well, and reword anything that might be confusing to the reader.
Title: Black Feminist Intellectuals
This article discusses how black feminist intellectuals have been marginalized from traditional definitions of intellectualism that have excluded women, people of color, and those who do not hold degrees. The author argues that studying intellectual traditions within these groups can help scholars learn more about the role of race, gender, and class in shaping our understandings of intellectualism. This has important implications for how we think about who counts as an intellectual and how these groups have been marginalized from this definition.
2) Thesis Statement:
I agree with the central argument put forth by the author: black feminist scholars like Anna Julia Cooper, Mary Church Terrell, and Ida Bell Wells Barnett have been marginalized from traditional definitions of intellectualism because they do not fit the mold of the “scholar-celebrity.” Studying their work can help us to learn more about what role race, gender, and class played in shaping ideas about who counts as an intellectual during this time.
3) Body Paragraph:
I think this work has a lot of potentials. The author makes a compelling argument that by studying these scholars, we can better understand the role race, gender and class played in shaping who counted as an intellectual during this time. In doing so, she brings to light several vital points surrounding black women’s scholarly achievements that have been marginalized from traditional definitions of intellectualism. This work ultimately calls for a more nuanced definition of intellectualism than what has typically been advocated, especially by male scholars, who have tended to valorize certain qualities like degrees and celebrity status over actual knowledge production.
Overall, this work is significant because it provides an in-depth analysis of how black feminist scholars have contributed to our understanding of race, gender, and class. At the same time, this paper successfully counters stereotypes surrounding black women’s intellectual history and illuminates how these scholars have been marginalized from traditional definitions of intellectualism. The work’s main strengths [List your 3-4 strongest points]
However, I would suggest that in future editions of this paper, the author provides a more in-depth analysis of the relationship between black feminists and other types of feminist theory.
Writing a critique for a play is a unique process. No other type of writing is as dependent upon performance. What you see on the page, what you read about the characters and the story, does not compare to seeing it performed by actors and actresses who breathe life into your critique before your very eyes.
Take the time to read the play at least once, from beginning to end.
Jot down notes about what you liked and didn’t like. Consider all elements of the play.
This step involves complete rereading of the play. Take careful note of plot structure and character development and how language is used to affect mood. Rewrite your notes, condensing everything you’ve observed into a few sentences that summarize the critiques in your notes.
Write an introduction designed to grab the reader’s attention and convince them to read on and learn more about your critique of the play. This is not intended to be a summary of who wrote it and when it was staged, nor does it need to include a plot summary.
Instead, you must demonstrate what made this play essential and how it contributed to the development of its genre as well as theater itself.
A critique paper is an evaluation essay that provides both positive and negative feedback on strengths and weaknesses. Placing a critique within a specific context can help to support your argument and highlight its significance. We hope this article/blog on ‘how to write a critique’ meets up your expectation. Thanks for reading!